Red herring
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Red herring
For some reason I can't reply on the article about 'reasons for not building on this land'
For me it is a red herring that HBBC want to put a travellers site on this land. I think the reasons as listed in the article are much stronger and should be given greater emphasis. I'm pleased to see they have been captured on the poster, eg the impact on tourism, biodiversity, impact on National Forest, limited infrastructure, poor access etc etc.
I do not think this site is suitable for any dwellings, any collection of dwellings would have a negative impact on the area - even expensive 'executive' housing. I hope there would be such strength of feeling for any development.
For me it is a red herring that HBBC want to put a travellers site on this land. I think the reasons as listed in the article are much stronger and should be given greater emphasis. I'm pleased to see they have been captured on the poster, eg the impact on tourism, biodiversity, impact on National Forest, limited infrastructure, poor access etc etc.
I do not think this site is suitable for any dwellings, any collection of dwellings would have a negative impact on the area - even expensive 'executive' housing. I hope there would be such strength of feeling for any development.
lakie2- Posts : 1
Join date : 2009-02-08
Red Herring
Lakie
You make the point well you would not build any houses, bungalows, flats or traveller pitches on this site, but it is far from being a red herring it is in the document as a preffered site.
David
You make the point well you would not build any houses, bungalows, flats or traveller pitches on this site, but it is far from being a red herring it is in the document as a preffered site.
David
David Sprason CC- Posts : 27
Join date : 2009-02-01
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|